![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
People who say to me, "I don't read fiction. Real life is interesting enough" - fuck you people. Fuck your interesting lives which are not usually interesting. I act nice when you ask me what I am reading as a setup to tell me that you don't read fiction because real life is interesting enough, but what I am thinking every time is "fuck you." Jesus Christ, you arrogant fucks. Like you have a monopoly on truth. Your preferences are no more than preferences, and the books you read could be fakedy fake fake fake and you would never know because they are more removed from your personal frame of reference than most literature. Shut up. I read nonfiction too, and even if I didn't, shut up.
(no subject)
Date: 2010-02-11 03:30 am (UTC)Maybe I'm way off base in thinking that and am being horribly unfair to publishers, but that's my instinct and what I've been hearing from agents. It leads to a lot of sameyness and a lot of pandering and a lot of stuff that strikes me as exploitative rather than thoughtful. And there's a lot of great nonfiction out there, which I really appreciate as someone who loves nonfiction, and particularly good histories.
What upsets me is when I'm reading something that I've clearly chosen to read and somebody who hasn't read it tries to tell me that I'm inferior because the book is fiction. Not because the book is bad, but because the book is fiction and fiction is not worthwhile ever, period, because it's imaginary. It's doubly offensive when I say specifically that it's a book by a friend and that I'm enjoying it. Never mind that I myself am a fiction writer and fiction filmmaker (who also writes nonfiction and also makes documentaries) and the implication is that all of my very careful work is, by default, worthless (and unserious and girly, unlike true stories about football players who get injured).
There are ways to say "intereting, but not my bag" without asserting moral eliteness, you know?