(no subject)

Date: 2001-10-22 10:26 am (UTC)
Darwin wasn't all that influential if you think about it. I'm not saying he wasn't important -- I'm not saying that I don't respect the guy, and that he didn't set science on its way. But I have the feeling that some scientists already believed what he articulated, and that more would have come to that opinion if he hadn't.

Moreover, there are a lot of people who still don't believe him. Darwin only rocked the worlds of the uber-religious.

I guess what I'm saying is that I don't look at, for example, Vietnam and say "Darwin at work!" in the same way that I say "reminds me of the Russian Revolution, and the American response is very Jack the Ripper." I don't look at the race riots and say "natural selection!" so much as "Russian Revolution again -- the class struggle!" With computers, I don't say "origins of the species!" I say "ah, Freud's theories on how the mind works led to this."

To be fair, though, I do think that natural selection did have a certain influence -- just look at the eugenics movement, and the justification for keeping certain races/genders down. But since that had been going on for centuries prior, I simply look at Darwin as a new justification, not a crucible.
(will be screened)
(will be screened if not validated)
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

If you are unable to use this captcha for any reason, please contact us by email at support@dreamwidth.org

Profile

rinue: (Default)
rinue

April 2025

S M T W T F S
  12 345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930   

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 21st, 2025 08:17 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios