I'm going to say Gryffindor. Not because you sound Gryffindorish, which you do, but because I think you are right in your assumption that you would do best there. I'm convinced that that is the real way people are sorted, not by what they'd like, but where they will grow the most. Hence someone as intellectual as Hermione being Gryffindor, not Ravenclaw.
It could just be that I refuse to believe that a system that separates kids based on personality traits is inherently flawed. It is when a group of friends is made up of many different personalities that I find it to be strongest, and more able to do things. Granted, certain things need to be the same (nothing splits a group of up fast than a profound difference in ethics), but you can't all be leaders, or followers, or bookworms, or jocks, or geeks. Well, I guess you can be all geeks, but you have to be different kinds of geeks.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
branchandroot
Going with the Majority here...
Date: 2004-07-19 05:11 pm (UTC)It could just be that I refuse to believe that a system that separates kids based on personality traits is inherently flawed. It is when a group of friends is made up of many different personalities that I find it to be strongest, and more able to do things. Granted, certain things need to be the same (nothing splits a group of up fast than a profound difference in ethics), but you can't all be leaders, or followers, or bookworms, or jocks, or geeks. Well, I guess you can be all geeks, but you have to be different kinds of geeks.