rinue: (Default)
[personal profile] rinue
I find the Nicholas K fall collection hilarious, because the aesthetic it seems to try to express is: Imagine that we lived in a post-apocalyptic world. We're still very rich, though.

It's notable because post-apocalyptic depictions tend to be characterized by a certain equality; they're awful, but awful for everybody. Or perhaps I should say precarious for everybody. There is usually some form of (needless to say villainous) paramilitary organization, whether it's Water and Power in Tank Girl, the Thunderdomers in Mad Max, or whatever those cannibal guys are in The Road, but not a lot of comfort seperating the goodies and the baddies, and in keeping with that scarcity, a lot of baddies turn on each other rather than being united in their privilege.

Bear in mind I'm not talking about dystopian fiction generally, which is often characterized by wildly unequal wealth distribution. I'm talking specifically about the post-apocalyptic sort, which as a genre convention tends to shuffle the deck in favor of the gritty. It's almost entirely devoid of the idle rich. (Possible exception: Land of the Dead, which I haven't seen.)

But is that realistic? It doesn't seem to be what happened in most of the pre-industrial past, or areas of the modern world affected by desertification. You start to get kings and queens and powerful religious beliefs to tell you they deserve to be there.

Nicholas K may be accidentally, ridiculously, on the money.

(no subject)

Date: 2014-02-10 06:27 am (UTC)
movingfinger: (Default)
From: [personal profile] movingfinger
I already have plaid shirts, hoodies, rain pants, and rubber boots---indeed, I wear them regularly---so I'm all set to be fashion-forward!

Profile

rinue: (Default)
rinue

July 2014

S M T W T F S
   1 2345
678 9101112
1314151617 18 19
20 21 22 23 242526
2728293031  

Most Popular Tags

Page Summary

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 24th, 2014 10:58 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios